Engineering

Supabase vs Firebase in 2025: Which Should You Actually Use?

Both are excellent BaaS platforms. But they're optimized for different use cases, different teams, and different product philosophies. Here's the honest comparison we give clients.

Yazdan Asterki

Yazdan Asterki

Founder & Lead Engineer

February 14, 2025
9 min read
Supabase vs Firebase in 2025: Which Should You Actually Use?

The Real Question

"Should I use Supabase or Firebase?" is the wrong question.

The right question is: "What does my product need in the next 18 months, and which platform fits that trajectory?"

Having built production apps on both, here's our honest take.

Firebase: Strengths

1. Real-time first

Firestore's real-time listeners are genuinely excellent. If your product's core value is live collaboration (think Figma, Notion, multiplayer games), Firebase's real-time architecture is battle-tested and scales without you thinking about it.

2. Auth is best-in-class

Firebase Auth is the easiest auth system to set up in existence. Social logins, magic links, phone auth — all work in 30 minutes.

3. Ecosystem

FCM (push notifications), Crashlytics, Remote Config, A/B Testing — Firebase's ecosystem is unmatched if you're building a mobile-heavy product.

Supabase: Strengths

1. PostgreSQL

Supabase gives you a real PostgreSQL database. This is massive. You get:

  • Complex queries and JOINs
  • Database functions and triggers
  • Full-text search
  • Row Level Security (RLS) — the most underrated security feature in any BaaS
  • 2. Open Source and Portable

    Supabase is open source. You can self-host it. You can migrate your data to any PostgreSQL-compatible database. Firebase is a proprietary Google product — migrating away is painful.

    3. Pricing

    Supabase's free tier is genuinely useful (500MB database, 2GB bandwidth). Firebase's free tier is deceptive — Firestore reads/writes add up fast.

    The Decision Framework

    IF your app needs:
      - Complex relational data → Supabase
      - SQL queries → Supabase
      - Row Level Security → Supabase
      - Open source / self-host option → Supabase
      - Mobile app with real-time → Firebase
      - Rapid prototyping → Firebase
      - Google ecosystem → Firebase
    

    What We Use at NineLab

    We default to Supabase for almost everything.

    The combination of PostgreSQL + Row Level Security + the JavaScript client SDK is incredibly powerful. RLS policies mean you write security rules once in SQL, and they apply everywhere — no matter how a client accesses the database.

    -- Example RLS policy: users can only see their own data
    CREATE POLICY "Users can view own data"
      ON profiles
      FOR SELECT
      USING (auth.uid() = user_id);
    

    The exception: if a client has an existing Firebase setup or needs Firebase's mobile push notification infrastructure, we keep Firebase for those specific features and use Supabase for everything else.

    The Bottom Line

  • **Supabase** if you're building a web app with structured data, complex queries, or you value data portability.
  • **Firebase** if you're building a real-time or mobile-heavy product, especially within the Google ecosystem.
  • Most product teams will find Supabase more flexible and less expensive at scale. But Firebase is faster to get started with for simple use cases.

    SupabaseFirebaseBackendDatabaseBaaS
    Yazdan Asterki

    Written by

    Yazdan Asterki

    Founder & Lead Engineer at NineLab

    Work with us →